Do you think there should be more places to enjoy leisure activiteis in cities?
• I thinks so
• In seoul, there are various place to enjoy leisure activities
• in the countryside, thare aren't as many as Seoul
• many senior citizens are living in countryside
• a must that there shoul be more place to enjoy leisure activities.
I think so. This is becuase even though there are various places to enjoy leisure activities in Seoul, there aren't as many as Seoul in the countryside. Given many senior citizens are living in countryside thesedays, It is a must that there shoul be more place to enjoy leisure activities.
Do you think leisure facilities should be free for the public?
I know that people have a lot of different opinions about this, but I think
people should pay fees for using leisure facilities. This is because Charging for it would make those places easier to maintain which means you can use the places way cleaner and convenient. If recreastion centers are offered for free, most centers would get into trouble about managing it because of limited budget and labour. Therefore, I think charging for using fee is more reasonable than offering for free.
What sorts of problems do most cities have?
• to be concentrated all thing in Seoul
• many young people would like to live in and work in there. Which is leading Seoul to overcrowd and to increase prices
• other cities other than Seoul are facing to decrease popularity
• government should make policies to separate this concentration of popularity imperatively.
Cities have my many different kinds of problems, but I think the biggest concern is to be concentrated all thing in Seoul. Seoul is a center of economy and culture. So, many young people would like to live in and work in there. Which is leading Seoul to overcrowd and to increase prices especially real estate thesedays. On the contrary, other cities other than Seoul are facing to decrease popularity cuasing lack of labour. I think government should make policies to separate this concentration of popularity imperatively.