Your Answer ▼
International sports events, such as Olympics or World Cup, have been loved worldwide. Most of countries focus on these events during their periods, and sometimes people even fly to the other side of globe to watch games in person. However, throwing this kind of events does not always bring benefits to a host country. This essay will discuss both side of view in detail, and provide personal opinion.
To host an international event, tremendous expense is required. Host country spends lots of money that could have been used for other needed fields like social welfare. In addition, host cities mostly don’t have numerous stadiums that hold a number of global athletes and audiences, so they bring land and nature under construction to build the stadiums. For instance, a lot of mountains and trees were destroyed to build sufficient stadiums for 2018 Pyeongchang Olympic in South Korea.
However, there are several positive impacts on hosing such events. Firstly, a host country can advertise their local host city to bring domestic and international visitors, and it will consequently help nation’s economy. Secondly, national athletes can keep training in high qualified and internationally standardized facilities after the events. Lastly, players in less popular sports who had no choice but to go abroad to train because of lack of facilities can practice domestically.
In conclusion, despite of negative factors, hosting global sports events brings consistent benefits in long-term point of view. Because of bigger benefits than loss, a lot of countries desire to host an international sports event in their country. Therefore, I definitely think that advantages of hosting an international sports event outweigh disadvantages.
|