Topic: Some people believe that the personal information of violent criminals should be made available to the public. Others think that this information should be protected. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Whenever awful crimes happen, it has been controversial whether the personal information of brutal criminals should be released to citizens or not. Some firmly believe that the information must be sealed. However, there is a more persuasive opinion that the information must be accessible to everyone for safety.
On the one hand, if serious offenders’ information is opened to the public, they cannot return to their society forever and might repeat the same type of offenses. In effect, they will not do anything provided that their information is widespread throughout their living country. For instance, let’s suppose that a criminal seeks to get a job. When companies hire a new employee, interviewers will check their private data. In that situation, the criminal never has a chance to be hired. This demonstrates that the release of information leads to the impossibility of returning to daily life.
On the other hand, brutal criminals’ information should be publicly released for the safety of citizens. Because the criminals already lost their ethical responsibility, it is highly likely to commit felony again. For instance, we can easily hear the news where a sex offender commits a sexual assault once again. As this case reveals, people who commit unimaginable crimes do not blame themselves and may do it again.
To sum up, it is undeniable that it is necessary to rehabilitate felons without opening their private data. Nevertheless, in order to prevent similar crimes from happening, everyone should be accessible to their information.