▶ Your Answer :
The reading passage contends that the origin of theses forts with their distinctive stonework can be explained by three theories. On the other hand, the lecturer makes counterargument with three point.
First, the writer acclaims that signal fires led to vitrification. This supported by the fact that the vitrified stones are most common on the upper parts of the walls. However, the professor pointed out that entire upper parts of walls were vitrified. If walls were used to signal fires, only a few walls would have been vitrified.
Second, the author asserts that lightning caused the stones of forts vitrified. In addition, lightning accounts for the uneven appearance of the walls. In contrast, the lecturer refutes the argument, saying that if lightning had made the stones vitrified, lightning must have heated on one spot over and over. It was virtually impossible that lightning strikes many times. Moreover, the uneven appearance was natural given that the forts was built long time ago.
According to the reading, forts were built using volcanic rock which is already vitrified. The ancient residents of Scotland used volcanic rock. On the other hand, the speaker pointed the absence of record of eruption, which means that people should have transported volcanic rock from far area. However, There is no proper read to transport heavy materials. Thus, residents should have used the local material in building forts 점수: 27 지적할 부분이 없는 통합형 에세이입니다. 통합형 에세이에서는 리딩과 리스닝이 한 주제에 대하여서 서로 어떻게 비교하고 반박을 하는 것인지를 보는 것입니다. 지금 이 에세이 같은 경우에는 리딩이나 리스닝 둘 다 서로 무엇을 위해서 반박을 하는 지를 잘 보여주는 거 같습니다. 주제에 대하여서 파악이 잘 된 통합형 에세이라고 생각합니다. 수고많으셨습니다. |