▶ Your Answer :
The lecturer thinks that it could be an illusion to cast too
optimistic opinion on wave energy. The wave energy is not a reliable source,
also causing pollutants and can negatively affect the surrounding landscape.
Thus the lecturer disagrees the reading passage’s main idea that wave farm
would increase in the future.
First, the lecturer thinks that wave energy is
not a predictable and constant source. Since the converters can malfunction frequently
in the harsh marine environment, disruptions could be made. So the lecturer
refutes the reading passage’s argument that the wave energy is easily predicted and constantly produced.
Second, the lecturer points out that wave
energy could also be harmful to environment. The floating converters could
generate pollutants, thus adversely affecting the marine ecosystem. That is the
reason why the lecturer objects the reading passage’s idea that wave energy is environmentally
friendly.
Third, the
lecturer contends that the wave farms could have negative impacts on natural beauty
of the surroundings. Since the floating converters are highly visible and
brightly colored, it is easily detacted from the shore. Therefore, the lecturer
oppose to the reading passage’s argument that the wave farms goes along well
with its surrounding land scape.
To sum up, the
lecturer thinks that wave energy doesn’t have many advantages so we should not
fully be dependant to it.
점수: 22 두 가지 부분에 있어서 문제가 보여지는 통합형 에세이입니다. 통합형 에세이에서 가장 중요한 부분을 차지하는 것은 한 주제에 대하여서 서로 다른 정보를 가지고 있는 리딩과 리스닝이 어떻게 비교하고 반박을 하는 것인지를 보는 것 입니다. 통합형 에세이에서는 결론을 서술하면 안됩니다. 또한 리딩에 대한 정보를 한 문장으로만 서술하였는데 한 문장으로 끝내는 것 보다는 리스닝을 좀 더 반박할 수 있는 부분들을 더 서술하시길 바랍니다. 수고많으셨습니다.
|