▶ Your Answer :
There might be some people who believe that
building a social house near their community has only disadvantages. However, I
personally disagree with the above idea for two subsequent reasons. Firstly,
regional economy grows up. Secondly, government builds good facilities in their
community.
First, communities that have the social
house grow up. To be specific, people in need come to the social house. They
need jobs and want to work anything. Also, their wage is cheaper than normal
person. What this means is that the communities could use them by low price.
Let me bring up my community as an example. When I was in high school, our
community had a lot of factory. However, factories could not work since most
community’s member was old people. It made our community depress. This
situation was changed because of a social house. Government built the social
house in our community and a lot of people came to our community. As a result,
the factories worked again thanks to worker from the social house and regional
economy grew up.
Second, government will build good
facilities near the social house. This is because people lived in the social
house need various things such as general hospitals, a library and national
parks. These facilities are also good to a local resident. Let me bring up my
community as an example again. After the social house was built, the government
also built library and university’s hospital. Since I was in high school, I
needed the quiet place where I could study SAT. So, I went to the library and
studied SAT every day. If government had not built the social house, I could
have not studied SAT in the library.
In conclusion, building social houses help
regional economy and government also build good facilities for people. In this
regard, I strongly agree with the statement that it is beneficial to the
community that government build a social house. |