▶ Your Answer : The reading passage contends that it is not difficult to infer some purposes of petroglyphs. On the other hand, the lecturer brings up several points that contradict this argument. to contradict this argument. First, the lecturer points that petroglyphs did not function as communication tools. It is attributed to the fact that the same The same (it is attributed to the fact~같은 표현은 적절하지 않습니다) image in carvings were different meaning of nearby tribes. Thus, the caving used spirals and dots might indicate different meaning in tribes. This refutes the author's point that petroglyphs functioned as communication tools. Moreover, in the lecture, the point is made that petroglyphs were not made for religious ceremonies to call upon divine powers. It is obviously petroglyphs related to Piko ceremony is too simple to indicate religious ceremonies. This casts doubts on the idea in the reading that petroglyphs were made for religious ceremonies to call upon divine powers. The final point made by the lecturer is that petroglyphs were not created by ordinary people to escape boredom. It is true that ancient people did not have modern sources of entertainment, but they had other entertainment not only carving but also hunting and fishing. This is different from the passage's view that petroglyphs were created by ordinary people to escape boredom.
점수: 23 리딩에 대한 정보가 많이 부족한 통합형 에세이입니다. 통합형 에세이에서 가장 중요한 부분을 차지하는 것은 한 주제에 대하여서 서로 다른 정보를 가지고 있는 리딩과 리스닝이 어떻게 비교하고 반박을 하는 것인지를 보는 것 입니다. 지금 이 에세이 같은 경우에 있어서는 리딩에 대한 부분이 각 단락에서 한 문장으로만 서술하였는데. 한 문장으로 끝내는 것 보다는 리스닝을 좀 더 반박할 수 있는 부분들을 더 서술하시길 바랍니다. 수고많으셨습니다.
|