> Playing eighteenth-century music on the instruments of > that period provides valuable information about how the > music originally sounded. Eighteenth-century instruments > cannot be played without being restored, however, and > restoring such an instrument destroys all of the information > that researchers could obtain from it about eighteenth- > century instrument-making techniques. 18세기 악기로 당시의 음악연주하는 것은 원래 어떤 sound였는지에대해 가치있는 정보를 제공한다. 18세기 악기덜은 복원하지 않으면 연주할 수 엄따 구러나, 그런(18세기)악기의 복원작업은 연구자가 18세기 음악제작기술에 대해 얻으수 있는 정보의 모든것을 뿌셔뻐린다 (A) Eighteenth-century instruments cannot be used to provide information about the original techniques used in playing such instruments if they have been restored. 18세기 악기는 ~에 대한 정보를 제공하는 데 사용할 수 없다. (B) Eighteenth-century instruments that have been restored can provide information only about how eighteenth-century music originally sounded 복원된 18세기 악기덜은 원래 소리에대해서"만" 정보를 제공한다 (C) Eighteenth-century instruments are the only source of information about the instrument-making tech- niques of that period. 그때 악기는 ~"만"이다 (D) An eighteenth-century instrument that has not been restored can provide more information than can one that has been restored. 복원안된건 복원된거보다 더많은 정보를 준다? (E) An eighteenth-century instrument cannot serve as a source of new information about eighteenth-century instrument-making techniques once it can be played 18세기 악기덜은 일단 연주되문 ~기술에 대한 새로운 정보를 얻을 수 엄따 답이 E 인거 같은데엽... 질문하실때 정답두 표시해주세염 틀리문 망신인디...--;;;